Conflicts are common in the workplace, and conflict-resolution strategies can help managers solve conflicts and maintain a healthy work environment. If you are a manager, project manager, or department leader, then you should know conflict-management techniques to quickly solve conflicts in your workplace.
However, unlike the functional environment, the environment in project management is dynamic and stressful. Conflicts are more common here. If you manage projects, you know how tense the environment can be and the importance of managing conflicts.
Conflict management techniques are universal; you can use them anywhere, according to the situation and requirements.
In today’s post, I will explain all conflict management techniques you can use to manage conflicts.
What is a Conflict?
A conflict is an intense disagreement that can occur when two or more stakeholders have different opinions or interests. According to the American Management Association, managers manage conflicts 24% of their time.
Don’t panic; the situation is usually not as bad as you think. Resolving conflicts appropriately can build trust and sometimes bring new ideas and opportunities. This can make the difference between a positive and negative outcome.
If you don’t solve the conflict, your team members will lose trust. This will weaken your position as a manager and your team’s ability to bond, which may affect your team’s performance. You must deal with conflict before it is beyond resolution.
The following are a few consequences of improper conflict management:
- Low team morale
- Negative impact on the project manager’s authority
- Increased number of personal clashes
- Low productivity and efficiency
- Low-quality work
Managers or supervisors must monitor and resolve conflicts quickly to keep them from becoming bigger issues.
What Are the Common Causes of Conflict in the Workplace?
Conflict in the workplace can occur for many reasons. The Harvard Business Review identifies four primary triggers for conflicts.
These triggers are:
- Poor communication
- Unrealistic performance expectations
- Poor time management
- Unclear roles and responsibilities
Some other triggers specific to project management are:
- Schedule priorities
- Personal reasons
Each of the factors mentioned above can cause conflict in the workplace. Instructions are often not passed to all employees correctly, and they act as per their understanding, which can cause conflict. Unrealistic performance goals demotivate and frustrate employees, which can cause conflict between employees or between employees and their supervisors.
Conflicts due to schedule priorities and personal reasons are more common in project management. Projects have limited resources, and team members fight for them. Also, every project has new team members who don’t know each other, so personal conflicts are common.
Whenever a conflict occurs, you should intervene and cool the temperature down. Ignoring conflicts can negatively affect the team. Leadership skills play key roles in resolving conflicts.
What Are Conflict Resolution Strategies?
The PMBOK Guide defines the five conflict-management techniques as follows:
- Withdraw/Avoid
- Smooth/Accommodate
- Compromise/Reconcile
- Force/Direct
- Collaborate/Problem-Solve
These conflict-management strategies are also known as “Thomas-Kilmann’s Five Approaches to Resolving Conflict.”
1. Withdraw/Avoid

In this approach, you will avoid or retreat from the conflict and allow it to resolve itself. This technique can be used when the stakes are low, and the conflict is likely to disappear on its own.
You can use this technique in the following cases:
- Individuals involved in the conflict are not influential stakeholders.
- The issue does not require a time investment.
- An intense argument has already happened, and the individuals need time to cool off.
- You do not have enough information to pursue other techniques.
Advantages of Withdraw/Avoid
This technique saves time. It is a good strategy for low-level disagreements and gives you enough time to prepare if the conflict re-emerges.
Disadvantages of Withdraw/Avoid
Withdraw/avoid is not a resolution. It does not resolve conflict and may weaken your position because other parties may assume you have an unfair bias. Team members may think you lack skills or you are not authoritative.
Many experts don’t consider this technique a conflict management strategy because withdrawing and avoiding is not a solution.
2. Smooth/Accommodate

You find areas of agreement, try to smooth out the situation, and circumvent tough discussions. The smoothing technique gives more consideration to one party than the other. You downplay the seriousness and behave as if the conflict never existed.
This technique is helpful in the following cases:
- You don’t have time to deal with the problem.
- You require a temporary solution to the problem.
- The conflict is minor and involves less influential stakeholders.
Advantages of Smooth/Accommodate
This conflict-resolution strategy requires little effort. By ignoring unimportant arguments, you can focus on essential issues. Situations can be handled simply while bringing harmony, creating goodwill, and providing enough time to find a permanent solution.
Disadvantages of Smooth/Accommodate
If you fail to provide a balanced approach, then one party may get an unfair advantage, while the parties who are not being accommodated may question your authority and/or stop reporting conflicts altogether.
This conflict-resolution strategy is not recommended, as it often weakens the project manager’s authority.
3. Compromise/Reconcile

In this conflict-management strategy, you will take suggestions from both sides and partially satisfy them. This technique is useful when the stakeholders involved hold equal power.
You may use this technique in the following cases:
- All parties involved need to win.
- You have an equal relationship with both parties.
- Collaborative and forcing techniques have failed.
- You need a temporary solution.
Advantages of Compromise/Reconcile
This technique produces quick results, lowers stress, and keeps all parties satisfied until a permanent solution is found. You can then cool off and revisit the situation later.
Disadvantages of Compromise/Reconcile
This technique does not generate trust in the long run; all parties remain unsatisfied, and the conflict could resurface. Morals are not being strengthened. You may have to ensure all parties abide by the agreement.
4. Force/Direct

In this conflict-management strategy, you will agree with one party’s viewpoint and enforce their wishes. This is a win-lose situation and risks demoralizing the team.
You can use this conflict-management technique in the following cases:
- You need a quick solution.
- You know that one party is right.
- You do not have time to investigate.
- The conflict is not very important.
- The relationship with stakeholders is not essential.
Advantages of Force/Direct
This technique provides a quick solution. It requires almost no effort from the manager and may help establish their authority.
Disadvantages of Force/Direct
Using this technique may leave a negative impression. You may lose opportunities that could be gained from the opposing party’s viewpoint. You cannot apply this technique with powerful stakeholders, as it may backfire and worsen the conflict.
5. Collaborate/Problem-Solve

In a collaborative conflict-resolution strategy, you will discuss the issue with all parties and agree on a solution while considering multiple viewpoints.
You may use this technique in the following cases:
- You must incorporate multiple viewpoints.
- Influential stakeholders are involved.
- A consensus is required.
- You want to distribute responsibility.
Advantages of Collaborate/Problem-Solve
This is a real problem-solving technique that provides a solution to the conflict. It brings consensus, commitment, and shared responsibility for the outcome. This technique creates a win-win situation, builds your team’s confidence, earns respect, and establishes your authority.
Disadvantages of Collaborate/Problem-Solve
This technique is not suitable for quick solutions, as it requires time and effort. It is generally used for conflicts that may affect your project.
What Are the Key Conflict Resolution Skills?
You will need many skills to solve conflicts in your workplace. Leadership style is most vital to this.
Leadership Skills
Leadership skills help you constructively guide your team members during conflict. Effective leaders listen and understand all parties’ views and build an environment of mutual respect. They show empathy and address concerns. Leaders facilitate problem-solving by encouraging collaboration and mediating discussions to find common ground.
Effective leaders use emotional intelligence to manage their reactions and maintain composure. Decision-making skills enable leaders to implement fair, balanced solutions. By modeling these behaviors, leaders inspire stakeholders to engage in constructive conflict resolution, thus promoting a harmonious, productive work environment.
Interpersonal Skills
Interpersonal skills facilitate clear communication, empathy, and emotional regulation. Active listening helps the manager understand all perspectives and minimize misunderstandings. Empathy helps recognize and validate the feelings of all involved parties and de-escalate tensions.
Effective communication ensures the respectful expression of thoughts and builds mutual understanding. Patience and perseverance ensure thorough and amicable resolutions. Together, these skills create a conducive environment for resolving conflicts effectively.
Problem-Solving
Every problem is unique and requires a different strategy. As a manager, you should know which conflict-resolution strategy you should use for any solution. For example, if two unimportant stakeholders are having a conflict that will not affect the project or its outcome, you may simply ignore it. Understanding conflict-management techniques and their use is vital for solving conflict efficiently.
Best Practices for Using Conflict-Management Strategies
The following are the best practices for using conflict-management strategies:
- Understand the Conflict: To solve any conflict, you must understand it first. You must find out which stakeholders are involved in the conflict, whether they are influential or non-influential, etc. Then, you must find the conflict’s root cause. Don’t believe rumors; instead, get firsthand knowledge by speaking privately with the stakeholders involved in the conflict.
- Bring Involved Stakeholders Together: After understanding the conflict, bring all stakeholders together and don’t allow external intervention. Keep the meeting in a closed space. Build a positive environment and let the parties speak. Conflicts often arise due to misunderstandings, and a simple, open conversation can often solve conflict. Encourage them to find a solution on their own.
- Find/Provide a Solution: If the parties involved in the conflict do not find a solution themselves, you must step in. You must listen to all parties’ viewpoints, and if one party is obviously wrong, you must convince them to accept their mistakes. If the problem is complex, you must try to find common ground and use collaborative techniques to resolve agreeable conflict. You can also use any other technique that suits the situation.
- Monitor Stakeholders: After implementing the decided conflict-resolution strategy, you must follow up with all involved stakeholders and monitor them until you are sure that they no longer have conflicts. If a conflict arises again, you must intervene, and this time, you can take stronger steps to suppress the conflict.
Which Conflict Management Technique Should I Use?
No single conflict-management technique can be used for all conflicts; it depends on the situation and the stakeholders involved.
For example, what should you do if two ground-level laborers conflict?
You may ignore it.
However, if you see that some important stakeholders are conflicting, you will intervene, solve the conflict, and save the workplace from negative impact.
Although no single technique can be used for all conflicts, the Collaborate/Problem-Solve method will bring the most consensus and commitment.
The best method to solve the conflict is to prevent it in the first place.
You cannot prevent all conflicts, but the following practices can help you reduce them:
- Establish Ground Rules: These can help discipline team members, which will result in less conflict.
- Form an Effective Communication Plan: This can help you avoid many conflicts. Define how much and how often you will communicate with your stakeholders.
- Form a Better Stakeholder Management Plan: Your project will be successful if your stakeholders are happy. Project management is all about managing stakeholder requirements.
- Solve Conflict Early: This takes little time and effort. It also prevents an unresolved conflict from resurfacing later.
I have now explained all the conflict-resolution strategies and how you can use them. As a manager, you must respond rationally and reach a solution that best serves your objective.
While resolving a conflict, keep the following points in mind:
- Each participant deserves respect.
- Be calm and rational.
- People are separate from problems.
- Each participant should be listened to patiently.
- There are always areas of agreement and disagreement.
- You should explore all possible solutions.
- Mind your biases, and don’t pick sides.
- Don’t force or pressure participants.
- Postponed conflicts may fester.
- Focus on the conflict; don’t let it escalate, and don’t generalize the issue.
Benefits of Conflict Resolution
The following are key benefits of effective conflict resolution:
- A More Positive Work Environment: Proactive conflict resolution can build a more positive work environment, which can lead to long-term employee retention. A culture that values conflict resolution will attract top talent and boost employee morale.
- Reduced Stress and Anxiety: Unresolved conflicts can cause significant stress and anxiety. Effective conflict resolution can help lower stress levels, improve employee mental health, and enhance job satisfaction.
- Improved Relationships: Resolving conflicts can strengthen relationships by addressing underlying issues and promoting shared understanding. When conflicts are resolved constructively, it can enhance communication, increase trust, and build stronger bonds among workers.
- Increased Productivity: Unresolved conflicts can hinder productivity and efficiency. Effective conflict resolution can lead to better collaboration, innovation, and creativity.
Summary
Conflict can occur at any time, and unresolved conflicts are not conducive to the work environment. They can become a significant issue affecting employee morale and work efficiency. Therefore, you must intervene and solve the conflict as soon as possible.
This topic is important from a PMP exam point of view.

I am Mohammad Fahad Usmani, B.E. PMP, PMI-RMP. I have been blogging on project management topics since 2011. To date, thousands of professionals have passed the PMP exam using my resources.

How is the project management environment different from a functional work environment?
Sir, i realy appreaciat your idea and its very educative, please sir what technique should be use in resolving the conflict over land.
I am really impressed with the topics dealt with conflict resolutions
Thanks Elfatih.
what the role as the PM or team member if conflict start to effect core project or one constrains should i start interfere to solve it or ask them to solve it by them self.
or should i report it
If you are not PM, you should report to PM.
If you are a PM you should use your best judgement to handle the issue.
Thanks for your notes and questions bank. Your notes really inspired me how to study PMP exam and I got it passed yesterday.
Congratulations Albert on passing the PMP exam.
Very informative,thanks.
You are welcome Rondity.
Hi Fahad,
I failed my first test and preparing for the second one.I prepared well with lot of material including PMBOK. But,i am unable to justify my weak areas.I purchased your 400 questions and scored 80% .Practiced well in all the areas.Can you advise me please?
Send me an email at [email protected] with all details, I will reply you.
Is I have to explain again the need of new requirements to members, which technique should I use? And when we are discussing alternative which one? I found the blog quite clear but to be honest I fail to differentiate when to use collaboration and compromise. Pls can you help me
Compromise is relatively quicker process where you take suggestion from both parties and reach on a conclusion.
In collaborative approach you have a detailed discussion with both parties to reach on a best solution.
may be you are right but in my opinion all strategy are for work and in my case the compromise is the best option for me. Thankyou for your material.
It depends on the situation and stakeholders involve with the conflicts.
Hello Fahad,
I successfully completed the exam and now Certified PM :) I want to thank you for these notes that really helped me understand the processes better in simpler terms. You are great teacher! I had purchased your formula guide and EVM guide as well which was immense help as well. Thank you and God bless you.
Congratulations Hazra on passing the PMP exam.
Hello Fahad,
Your blog is great help. I am currently preparing for my PMP exam. Every time I am stuck or fail to understand a term/usage/formula, I come here and your explanation(s) helps me understand it. I want to thank you for that. And I also appreciate that you update your notes when there is a new edition of PMBOK. So this is a great reference site for people like me preparing to give their exams. Best
You are welcome Hazra. Now the six edition of the PMBOK is arriving next year, so I will have update them again.
Thanks for your comment.
Hey Fahad,
Thanks for your awesome notes. I also purchased the question set on Kindle.
Helped me clear the test on first attempt.
Regards,
Amol
Congratulations Anmol on passing the PMP exam, and I am glad that I could be of help to you.
I like your post, Thank you for the efforts in updating to latest PMBOK and helping the community.
Thanks
Qhayum
Thanks Qhayum.
Can I please ask this question?
Is problem solving the most effective, sustainable conflict resolution technique?
Please provide reasons to substantiate your response.
Discuss your opinion point by point. Thank you
Please read the blog post again till end. This topic has been explained in detail.
Okay Ram, in future update I will try to include some scenario based examples.
Hi,
I do see 3 to 5 questions coming out in MOCK Exams from Conflict resolution techniques. They are very close in resemblance among each other. However I commit the mistake between Smooth/Accomodate, Compromise/Reconciliation and also between Force/Direct, Withdraw/Avoid.
Judgement becomes tough & above explanations are quite lengthy to recall/remember. In such case, is it possible to provide one scenario(Same people) with different situations that match the 5 conflict resolution techniques to understand?
Many Thanks.
Regards,
Ram Narayan
No more conflicts. These techniques are great(Withdraw/Avoid,Smooth/Accommodate, Compromise/Reconcile,Force/Direct,Collaborate/Problem Solve) http://ku.ac.ke
Thanks James for visiting and leaving comment.
I checked the PMOBOK fifth ed. and as you mention, but I also noticed the word confront (in pencil) near the word collaborate. I remembered that our instructor told us they have same meaning.
“but I also noticed the word confront (in pencil) near the word collaborate” – I did not understand what do you mean?
Fahad,
Another nice post. In fact, conflict management technique is a fav topic of mine as well.
However, I am unable to get – how compromise is loose-loose. Wont it be loose-win, even if temporary?
In compromise both parties have to give up something to reach on a common consensus.
(Please note that this article is based on the fourth edition of the PMBOK Guide, in fifth edition, PMI has amalgamated collaborative and problem solving techniques.)
Hello All
Which one is the worst conflict resolution method? I think its :forcing/directing, but ive seen places which advocate that withdrawing/avoiding is the worst one. Please share your thoughts.
It depends on situation.
Hi,
In PMBook 5th edition, collaborating and problem solving are given as synonyms. As for confronting it disappeared, however I just did the exam and it is still the term they use for this. The way I see it, confronting is the same general ideology than collaborating and problem solving, all seeks win-win situation.
Here is an excerpt from 5th ed.:
“There are five general techniques for resolving conflict. As each one has its place and use, these are not given in any particular order”
[…]
“Collaborate/Problem Solve. Incorporating multiple viewpoints and insights from differing perspectives; requires a cooperative attitude and open dialogue that typically leads to consensus and commitment.”
I also think confronting/problem solving/collaborating leads to best solutions. As with many other things in life, we often have to select optimal result given the constrains rather than the very best one.
Confronting is not a win-lose, its aim at win-win. you confront ideas of both party and the aim (the very reason why it’s time consuming) is by sharing actively their point of view, a common agreement will emerge (which can be to agree about one or the other party position or on a new position). Since it must be common agreement, it can only be win-win (unless it is a disguised compromise because one of the party pretend to agree). It is really the equivalent of collaborating/problem solving.
In the fourth edition of the PMBOK Guide, confronting and collaborative approach were different, now they are synonyms….
I’m sorry. Read the PMBOK again, and your sources. The PMBOK and PMI reinforce that the book is a “best practices” book, every management book is; take great care to understand and internalize that because the real world is quite different. No credible source can provide us with the “one and only” way, or the best way for all management situations.
The PMBOK does not say (quoting you) “applying the same technique to all conflicts” would be justified.
It actually says the opposite, which ironically is the case your’re making. “…each one has its place and use,”. For example, avoiding a problem, can be VERY effective in certain situation; particularly on a “high functioning” team.
Now, you’re right about the industry consensus on confronting providing the best outcomes and usually as the favorable approach… It is! You just have to know when you have the OPPORTUNITY to use it, and how to employ it.
(I’m a PMP and a “seasoned” Construction PM) Good luck to you!
I should add; collaborating and confronting are cross from parallels. That might be confusing you. If you read the Thomas-Kilman Conflict Mode Instrument; that definition of collaboration is very close to confronting. That and correctly diagnosing the issue goes hand in hand.
However, collaboration is less optimal since it takes time. Every time a conflict comes up; there’s not always time to have a campfire and roast marshmallows. I think the PMBOK is trying to show that finding the root problem, is not always an outcome of collaboration.
Hello eh,
You said that:
‘No credible source can provide us with the “one and only” way, or the best way for all management situations.’
I am agree with you on it.
Again you’ re saying:
The PMBOK does not say (quoting you) “applying the same technique to all conflicts” would be justified.
I’m totally agree with you here again, and in fact to prove this point I wrote this blog post. In this blog post I’m only trying to say that PMBOK does not say that you should apply one technique on all conflicts.
I would agree on collaborating is best solution and that also eventually goes to the root cause and as well buys in everybody OK which is a permanent solution than confronting/problem solving.
for the purpose of get few marks we have to choose confronting !
Thanks for agreeing with me.
I feel Fahad is right. Collaborating is the best technique to resolve the conflicts. In most of the real situations , we need all the team members to get along / participate without any grudges. This technique generally helps to take all the team members towards goals without hurting individual’s self esteem. Confronting can not be win – win always. I feel usage of techniques depends upon situation and project managers understanding.
Hello,
thank you for this post.
I really liked it.
Although I am still not sure I fully understand the difference between confonting and collaborating. Are there any specific features of these techniquest that can help differentiate them clearly?
Currently, I have a feeling that Confronting and Collaborating are almost the same thing
In collaborating, you incorporate multiple viewpoints and negotiate for the best solution. It is a win win approach, on the other hand confronting is problem solving technique. In confronting you will find the root cause of the problem and then reach to its solution. Confronting is a win lose situation.
Hello Fahad,
I was going through the above comments where you mentioned that confronting is a win-lose situation. But if go by Rita Mulcahy , she mentioned confronting as Win-win situation.
Even in some of the multiple choice questions is it considered as win-win situation. can you please help to understand this better. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Gagan
In problem solving one loses and other wins regardless of who is on right path.
Not exactly. 2 people may be, dont have any right path, they go to discussion/argument to figure out what is the best way to deal with the conflict.
Confronting/problem solving includes:
– Find the root cause of problem, not what is presented to you or what appears to be the problem
– Analyze the problem
– Identify solution
– Pick a solution
– Implement a solution
– Review the solution and confirm that the solution can deal with the problem.
Hence, Confronting is win-win situation. Win-lose situation refer to Forcing solution (1 win, 1 lose)
Two team members are having conflict, most of the time one is correct and other is wrong.
In this case, if you go for the confronting then obviously the person who is in right path will win and other loses.
Collaborating does not necessarily fix the problem and may show up again, only Confronting does this, it gets to the “root cause”
Yes, you are right but it does not mean that the project manager should always go for confronting.
A project manager has to decide that which technique suits best to the situation.
I see your point thank you.
You are welcome.
What technique is used when a PM suggests to the Team members to contribute their respective PROS and CONS about the issue at hand and then suggests they discuss it. Is this collaborative or confronting?
It depends on what resolution he takes at the end. If he combines multiple view point and find the best agreeable solution, then it will be collaborative. And if he takes resolution of conflicts based on only facts then it will be confronting.
I think confronting will work here because PM trying to go to the root cause of this problem
You may be right but only discussion does not mean that he will chose the confronting. He may also go with the collaborative technique or try to smooth the situation. All depends on the situation and problem at the hand.
Yes you are absolutely right ! good
Thanks for agreeing with me!
:)
I like your post very much and am in a project management class right now. Although confronting has a negative connotation, it is not always such. Confronting a problem and dictating how it should be resolved is the PM's job and if the other techniques do not work this approach should be taken. PM'S will run into personalities that will have a conflict with everything or everyone. Taking a direct confrontational approach may be required and should not be seen as a negative componant. Your assessment is great and accurrate.
Thank you for liking my post.
My point is—there is no single universal technique which applies to all conflicts and the PMBOK Guide does not recommend using conflict resolution technique every time a conflict occurs.
good I appreciate yourwork I using as a projects references
Thanks Nasry.